Wednesday, August 12, 2009

A couple of Obama's advisors

That brings up another thing, John Holden, one of Obama's advisors.. his science advisor - some of his previous bright ideas:

- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation's water and food supply.

- Legalizing forced abortions (after all, we are a blight on this planet!)

- Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

- Implementing a system of "involuntary birth control," where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to "general social deterioration".

- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized "global police force" to enforce the measures outlined above.

Here's from another one of his advisors, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm's brother):

Substantively, it suggests services that promote the continuation of the polity-those that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations-are to be socially guaranteed as basic. Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.

Great. And these are the guys whispering in his ears, telling him what to do. Great ethics eh? No nutjobs around here! Nothing to see, MSM will say nothing about it, nothing to see or report, yeah, right sure.


  1. Diane:
    Bear with me on this...
    I do agree with those who "should" be sterilized as being those people who DO have a DEFINITE detrimental effect on society in general by overtaxing systems and programs already in place to aid and assist those TRULY in need.

    If people cannot afford to HAVE children, let alone PROPERLY RAISE them in a secure and safe enviroment, then maybe they should NOT be able to have them...makes a good case for all those "crack-moms", doesn't it?

    Taxpayers should NEVER have to pay for the lazy, irresponsible, and reprehensible of America. That's not how the Founding Fathers envisioned our society.

    But I agree with you 100% on every other issue!

    And yes, I also listen to FOX news...LOL.


  2. Yes, but you know how things get,, you can't go and start licensing for parents, once the government gets started on one thing, they're going to go overboard and start in on everyone. I agree, take away those kids from the crack-moms. I'd say as soon as someone finds out a crackmom is pregnant, lock her up where she CANNOT get drugs.. and take away the kid. and adopt out the baby.. but then again, you'd have to change rules in adoption, where most places will NOT place a black baby with parents of a different race. (stupid rule!) Babies are babies, and last time I looked, we were all humans. And I agree with the founding fathers. Did you happen to see Specter's face when that lady asked him that question about getting back to a Constitutional government at his town hall?

  3. Diane:
    Yeah, I saw that SPecter townhall...the look was "deer in the headlights" thing...ROFL!

    And you made a VERY good point about crackmoms, that I hadn't even considered...

    Very well thought out.
    You changed my mind...and that ain't easy, dear.
    And AGREED...keep the gov't OUT of it...look at the USPS...or they workin' out for everyone, hmm?

    Have a good weekend.